Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the smallblog domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/cestbonl/public_html/thehaleyreport/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6170

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/cestbonl/public_html/thehaleyreport/wp-includes/functions.php:6170) in /home4/cestbonl/public_html/thehaleyreport/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: NO ACCOUNTABILITY IN MASSACHUSETTS PROSECUTOR’S OFFICES https://thehaleyreport.com/2017/10/18/no-accountability-massachusetts-prosecutors-offices/ Wed, 18 Oct 2017 13:10:49 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0 By: Margo Nash https://thehaleyreport.com/2017/10/18/no-accountability-massachusetts-prosecutors-offices/#comment-169 Wed, 18 Oct 2017 13:10:49 +0000 http://thehaleyreport.com/?p=187#comment-169 In my experience over 30 years, the only infractions that the Board of Bar Overseers is concerned about involve the misuse of client funds. It it involves money, it involves the Board. If it’s mere theft of documents from the court file, or total misrepresentation of the facts to the tribunal, well, the Judge can deal with that, they say. They are useless in enforcing any sort of moral, ethical misconduct of any sort. Since prosecutors don’t handle “client” money, they are essentially immune from scrutiny. This may sound unbelievable, but I assure you, it is the norm. I’ve dealt with it more times than I’d care to remember over the course of the last 30 years. Forged signatures on deeds? “Well, he denies that it’s forged and his secretary remembers witnessing it.” Really? What about the handwriting expert I hired who said, beyond any reasonable doubt that the signature is forged? Well, that was a copy of a signature, because the offending lawyer LOST THE ORIGINAL IN A FLOOD IN HIS BASEMENT. Really? Who keeps client files in flooded basements in their houses. How convenient is that?

]]>